Navigating Post-Brexit Trade: The European Commission's Dynamic Alignment Proposal for SPS Rules

by Online Queso

2 meses atrás

Key Highlights:

The European Commission has proposed draft mandates for dynamic alignment on sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) rules, aiming to ease trade friction between the UK and EU.
The UK must adopt EU SPS standards, covering food safety, animal/plant hygiene, and more, while gaining early consultation rights without a voting presence in EU decision-making.
Concerns arise from the potential limitations on the UK's regulatory autonomy, particularly regarding novel foods like CBD products.

Introduction

The relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union has undergone significant transformation since Brexit, prompting ongoing discussions about trade agreements and regulatory standards. A key area of focus has been the regulatory framework governing sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures, which play a critical role in ensuring food safety and public health. On July 16, 2023, the European Commission (EC) released draft mandates aimed at establishing a dynamic alignment of SPS rules between the UK and the EU. This proposal seeks to mitigate trade disruptions and restore the flow of goods that has been impacted since the UK's departure from the EU.

As businesses navigate the complexities of post-Brexit regulations, understanding the implications of these draft mandates becomes paramount. The proposal stands to not only affect food safety standards but also the broader economic landscape for UK exporters and the evolving regulatory environment for sectors like CBD (cannabidiol) products. This article explores the nuances of the EC's dynamic alignment proposal and its potential impact on UK-EU trade relations.

Understanding Dynamic Alignment in SPS Rules

Dynamic alignment refers to a regulatory framework where parties to a trade agreement agree to synchronize their standards and regulations over time. The EC's draft mandates stipulate that the UK must adopt comprehensive EU SPS rules, which encompass a wide array of areas, including food safety, animal and plant hygiene, organic standards, pesticide controls, and labeling requirements.

Key Components of the Proposal

Under the proposed mandates, while the UK will not possess voting rights in EU decision-making processes, it will have the opportunity for early consultation during the formulation of new policies. This arrangement is intended to foster cooperation and ensure that UK stakeholders have a voice in shaping regulations that impact their operations.

In return for access to the EU market, the UK would be expected to contribute financially to relevant EU agencies and systems. This financial obligation raises questions about the extent to which the UK can maintain its regulatory independence while adhering to EU standards.

Implications for UK Businesses

The draft mandates come in response to a notable decline in UK agri-food exports to the EU, which reportedly dropped by 21% since Brexit. Factors contributing to this downturn include increased paperwork, border delays, and elevated costs associated with compliance with new regulations.

Mark Tallon, managing partner of Legal Foods, underscores the restrictive nature of the proposed alignment. He notes that there will be a limited number of exceptions allowing the UK to diverge from EU standards, primarily in cases where non-compliance does not lead to lower safety standards or negatively impact EU products entering the UK market. This limitation raises concerns about the UK's position as a "rule taker" rather than a "rule maker," particularly in sectors that are rapidly evolving, such as CBD products.

The Role of CBD Products in Regulatory Discussions

The CBD industry has emerged as a significant sector within the UK economy, with many companies seeking to navigate the complexities of novel food regulations. The recent developments in the SPS alignment proposal have sparked discussions about the future of CBD products in the UK.

Current Status of CBD Novel Foods

As of May 2025, the first positive risk assessment opinions for CBD products were granted, signifying a critical step toward formal licensing within the novel foods process. However, the approval process remains pending, and the question of how the dynamic alignment proposal will affect CBD regulations looms large.

Tallon expressed concerns about the potential stagnation of CBD approvals under the UK's regulatory framework. He raises pertinent questions about the fate of businesses that have invested in novel food submissions based on the premise of eventual approval. The urgency of aligning regulations with the EU could hinder the progress of these applications, leading to uncertainty for companies within the sector.

Perspectives from Industry Leaders

Eoin Keenan, co-founder and CEO of the CBD drinks and supplements brand Goodrays, remains optimistic about the industry's future. Drawing from his academic background in CBD policy, he believes that exceptions will be made for the CBD sector as the mandates are formalized. Keenan emphasizes the importance of continuing the authorization process for CBD products, given the sector's rapid growth and the potential for economic benefits.

Luca Bucchini, chairman of the European Specialist Sports Nutrition Alliance (ESSNA), recognizes the advantages of dynamic alignment, particularly for trade facilitation. He highlights that smoother trade flows with the EU could lead to considerable cost savings for both businesses and consumers. Bucchini encourages UK-based companies to actively engage with trade associations to voice their concerns and ensure their interests are represented in this evolving regulatory landscape.

The Broader Impact on Trade Relations

While the dynamic alignment proposal aims to streamline trade between the UK and the EU, it also raises questions about the broader implications of Brexit on UK businesses.

Benefits and Challenges of Diverging from EU Standards

Tallon suggests that Brexit could yield significant benefits for the UK if it diverges from EU rules, particularly in areas such as novel foods and health claims. However, the current trajectory appears to lean toward continued alignment with EU standards, leaving UK companies grappling with the disadvantages of being bound by regulations without the corresponding benefits of independence.

The ongoing negotiations surrounding the SPS rules highlight the delicate balance that must be struck between maintaining regulatory autonomy and ensuring access to vital markets. The sentiment among industry experts reflects a desire for clarity and a streamlined approach to regulatory compliance that fosters growth and innovation.

Engaging in the Regulatory Process

As the EC's draft mandates undergo review and negotiation, the next several months will be critical in determining how dynamic alignment will function in practice. Government bodies are actively collaborating with trade associations to address key issues and shape the implementation of these rules.

It is imperative for UK businesses, particularly those in sectors like agri-food and CBD, to engage proactively with their associations to ensure that their concerns are adequately represented. The evolving political and regulatory environment requires a concerted effort from industry stakeholders to navigate the complexities of post-Brexit trade.

Industry Perspectives on Brexit's Impact

Despite the challenges presented by Brexit, some industry leaders advocate for a reevaluation of the benefits that could arise from a more autonomous regulatory framework. Tallon suggests that there is a potential for the UK to capitalize on its independence by establishing alternative assessment regimes for novel foods that diverge from EU norms.

The Case for Regulatory Independence

Advocates for regulatory independence argue that the UK should not bind itself to EU rules, especially if it compromises the potential for innovation and growth in key sectors. Tallon voices a sentiment shared by many, expressing disappointment over the prospect of the UK continuing to operate under EU regulations while lacking the ability to influence decision-making.

The call for a reassessment of the UK's relationship with the EU resonates within the business community, highlighting the desire for a more favorable regulatory environment that supports growth and development.

CBD Novel Food Impact Survey

In response to the evolving regulatory landscape surrounding CBD products, the Cannabis Trades Association has launched a CBD Novel Food Impact Survey. This initiative aims to gather insights into the financial, operational, and regulatory challenges faced by businesses in the CBD sector since the introduction of novel foods regulations in 2018.

Objectives of the Survey

The survey seeks to collect evidence-based data to inform the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and other stakeholders about the impact of regulatory processes on CBD manufacturers and distributors. The anonymized findings will be instrumental in advocating for a more proportionate and effective regulatory environment that supports the growth of the CBD industry.

By engaging the industry in this survey, the Cannabis Trades Association aims to shine a light on the experiences of businesses navigating the complexities of novel foods regulations, ultimately contributing to a more favorable regulatory framework.

FAQ

Q: What is dynamic alignment in the context of the SPS rules?
A: Dynamic alignment refers to a regulatory framework where the UK agrees to adopt EU SPS standards to facilitate smoother trade relations post-Brexit.

Q: How will the proposed mandates affect UK businesses?
A: UK businesses will need to comply with EU SPS standards, which may limit their regulatory autonomy. However, they will gain early consultation rights in EU policy development.

Q: What is the current status of CBD products in the UK?
A: As of May 2025, the first positive risk assessment opinions for CBD products have been granted, but formal licensing is still pending, raising concerns about potential delays due to the dynamic alignment proposal.

Q: What are the implications of Brexit on trade relations?
A: Brexit has led to increased trade friction, with a notable decline in UK agri-food exports to the EU. The dynamic alignment proposal aims to address these issues, but concerns about regulatory independence remain.

Q: How can businesses engage with the regulatory process?
A: UK businesses are encouraged to participate actively through trade associations to voice their concerns and influence the implementation of new SPS rules.

Carrito de compra